PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7713

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 320W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9275F across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 84,620).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9275F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9275F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.1% higher average FPS across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,621 less on MSRP ($3,439 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Delivers 109.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌42.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 225W.

EPYC 7713

2021

EPYC 9275F

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 320W, a 95W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.1% higher average FPS across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,621 less on MSRP ($3,439 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Delivers 109.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9275F across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 84,620).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9275F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌42.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9275F better than EPYC 7713?

Yes. EPYC 9275F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 29.1% average FPS lead across 28 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9275F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.1% more average FPS across 28 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9275F is the better fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9275F is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9275F is $3,621 cheaper on MSRP at $3,439 MSRP versus $7,060 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.1% average FPS lead across 28 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 109.3% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9275F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7713 Benchmark Check

EPYC 9275F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9275F
1080p
low	195 FPS	315 FPS
medium	159 FPS	290 FPS
high	129 FPS	241 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	204 FPS
1440p
low	160 FPS	278 FPS
medium	125 FPS	230 FPS
high	97 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	159 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	191 FPS
medium	60 FPS	157 FPS
high	47 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	107 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open EPYC 9275F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9275F
1080p
low	267 FPS	725 FPS
medium	235 FPS	618 FPS
high	193 FPS	485 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	421 FPS
1440p
low	219 FPS	579 FPS
medium	198 FPS	510 FPS
high	167 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	135 FPS	338 FPS
medium	124 FPS	300 FPS
high	112 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	239 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open EPYC 9275F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9275F
1080p
low	837 FPS	923 FPS
medium	698 FPS	748 FPS
high	650 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	574 FPS	572 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	724 FPS
medium	500 FPS	584 FPS
high	459 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	401 FPS	433 FPS
4K
low	430 FPS	511 FPS
medium	336 FPS	421 FPS
high	300 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	309 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open EPYC 9275F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9275F
1080p
low	975 FPS	1141 FPS
medium	883 FPS	1015 FPS
high	758 FPS	902 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	813 FPS
1440p
low	752 FPS	891 FPS
medium	654 FPS	785 FPS
high	558 FPS	689 FPS
ultra	479 FPS	600 FPS
4K
low	540 FPS	650 FPS
medium	479 FPS	580 FPS
high	420 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	363 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open EPYC 9275F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9275F

EPYC 7713

The EPYC 7713 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,018 points. Launch price was $7,060.

EPYC 9275F

The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7713 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9275F offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7713 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713 versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F — a 26.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The EPYC 7713 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9275F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713 scores 83,018 against the EPYC 9275F's 84,620 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 9275F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9275F
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+167%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	4.8 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2 GHz	4.1 GHz+105%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	83,018	84,620+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9275F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713 versus 6000 on the EPYC 9275F — the EPYC 9275F supports 60.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7713) vs 12 (EPYC 9275F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713) and SP5 (EPYC 9275F).

Feature	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9275F
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	6000+88%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9275F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F). Direct competitor: EPYC 7713 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P.

Feature	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9275F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7713 launched at $7060 MSRP, while the EPYC 9275F debuted at $3439. On MSRP ($7060 vs $3439), the EPYC 9275F is $3621 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9275F — making the EPYC 9275F the 70.7% better value option.