
EPYC 4585PX
Popular choices:

EPYC 8534P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,830 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 676.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 200W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 8534P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 71,900).
EPYC 8534P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅242.9% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4585PX
2025EPYC 8534P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,830 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 676.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 200W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 8534P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅242.9% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 71,900).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than EPYC 8534P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 130 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 725 FPS | 786 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 760 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 682 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 250 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1022 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 912 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 771 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 597 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 599 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 375 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4585PX and EPYC 8534P

EPYC 4585PX
EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

EPYC 8534P
EPYC 8534P
The EPYC 8534P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 71,900 points. Launch price was $4,950.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 8534P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 8534P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8534P — a 59.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 8534P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the EPYC 8534P's 71,900 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 8534P. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 64 / 128+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+84% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+87% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 70,563 | 71,900+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,678 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,882 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8534P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 8534P — the EPYC 4585PX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8534P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 256 — 127.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 6 (EPYC 8534P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 96 (EPYC 8534P) — the EPYC 8534P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and SP6 (EPYC 8534P).
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 1152 GB+471859100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 96+243% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs AMD-V (EPYC 8534P). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 8534P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 8534P targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; EPYC 8534P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4585PX launched at $699 MSRP, while the EPYC 8534P debuted at $5529. On MSRP ($699 vs $5529), the EPYC 4585PX is $4830 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 8534P — making the EPYC 4585PX the 154.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-87% | $5529 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9+676% | 13.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













