Core i7-8809G vs EPYC 8324PN

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-8809G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2270 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2270 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 8,448).
❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.

Core i7-8809G

2018

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2270 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2270 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 8,448).
❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8809G better than EPYC 8324PN?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8324PN makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-8809G is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-8809G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.9% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-8809G is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-8809G is the smarter buy today. Core i7-8809G is at an unclear MSRP at $450 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 15.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2270, and 1500% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 8 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-8809G Benchmark Check

EPYC 8324PN Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-8809G	EPYC 8324PN
1080p
low	188 FPS	159 FPS
medium	149 FPS	131 FPS
high	119 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	142 FPS
medium	118 FPS	114 FPS
high	93 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	68 FPS
medium	59 FPS	58 FPS
high	47 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-8809G Open EPYC 8324PN

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-8809G	EPYC 8324PN
1080p
low	211 FPS	209 FPS
medium	211 FPS	209 FPS
high	211 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	211 FPS	194 FPS
medium	211 FPS	176 FPS
high	198 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	208 FPS	120 FPS
medium	176 FPS	111 FPS
high	146 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	79 FPS

Open Core i7-8809G Open EPYC 8324PN

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-8809G	EPYC 8324PN
1080p
low	211 FPS	209 FPS
medium	211 FPS	209 FPS
high	211 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	209 FPS
1440p
low	211 FPS	209 FPS
medium	211 FPS	209 FPS
high	211 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	209 FPS
4K
low	211 FPS	209 FPS
medium	211 FPS	209 FPS
high	211 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	209 FPS

Open Core i7-8809G Open EPYC 8324PN

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-8809G	EPYC 8324PN
1080p
low	211 FPS	209 FPS
medium	211 FPS	209 FPS
high	211 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	209 FPS
1440p
low	211 FPS	209 FPS
medium	211 FPS	209 FPS
high	211 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	209 FPS
4K
low	211 FPS	209 FPS
medium	211 FPS	209 FPS
high	211 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	209 FPS

Open Core i7-8809G Open EPYC 8324PN

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-8809G and EPYC 8324PN

Core i7-8809G

The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8809G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 8324PN offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-8809G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.05 GHz). The Core i7-8809G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 8324PN uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8809G scores 8,448 against the EPYC 8324PN's 8,375 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-8809G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN.

Feature	Core i7-8809G	EPYC 8324PN
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	32 / 64+700%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+40%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+51%	2.05 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+1500%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Kaby Lake G (2018)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	8,448	8,375

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8809G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 8324PN uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.