EPYC 7713 vs EPYC 7763

AMD

EPYC 7713

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 7763

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7713

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $830 less on MSRP ($7,060 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
  • Delivers 9.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
  • Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7763 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 84,440).

EPYC 7763

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
  • 24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7763 better than EPYC 7713?
Yes. EPYC 7763 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7763 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7763 is the better fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7763 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7713 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 7763 is 11.8% more expensive on MSRP at $7,890 MSRP versus $7,060 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7713 is also 9.9% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7763 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7713EPYC 7763
1080p
low195 FPS190 FPS
medium159 FPS155 FPS
high129 FPS123 FPS
ultra100 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low160 FPS156 FPS
medium125 FPS123 FPS
high97 FPS94 FPS
ultra77 FPS75 FPS
4K
low72 FPS72 FPS
medium60 FPS60 FPS
high47 FPS46 FPS
ultra39 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7713EPYC 7763
1080p
low267 FPS418 FPS
medium235 FPS367 FPS
high193 FPS299 FPS
ultra158 FPS234 FPS
1440p
low219 FPS344 FPS
medium198 FPS310 FPS
high167 FPS259 FPS
ultra133 FPS197 FPS
4K
low135 FPS211 FPS
medium124 FPS194 FPS
high112 FPS163 FPS
ultra94 FPS131 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7713EPYC 7763
1080p
low837 FPS836 FPS
medium698 FPS696 FPS
high650 FPS649 FPS
ultra574 FPS573 FPS
1440p
low602 FPS602 FPS
medium500 FPS500 FPS
high459 FPS458 FPS
ultra401 FPS400 FPS
4K
low430 FPS430 FPS
medium336 FPS335 FPS
high300 FPS300 FPS
ultra243 FPS242 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7713EPYC 7763
1080p
low975 FPS975 FPS
medium883 FPS885 FPS
high758 FPS761 FPS
ultra656 FPS655 FPS
1440p
low752 FPS745 FPS
medium654 FPS648 FPS
high558 FPS554 FPS
ultra479 FPS476 FPS
4K
low540 FPS531 FPS
medium479 FPS473 FPS
high420 FPS414 FPS
ultra363 FPS360 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7763

AMD

EPYC 7713

The EPYC 7713 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,018 points. Launch price was $7,060.

AMD

EPYC 7763

The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7763 share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713 versus 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 — a 5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7713 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm+ process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7713 scores 83,018 against the EPYC 7763's 84,440 — a 1.7% lead for the EPYC 7763. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 7713EPYC 7763
Cores / Threads
64 / 128
64 / 128
Boost Clock
3.68 GHz+5%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.45 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm+
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
83,018
84,440+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713) and SP3 (EPYC 7763).

FeatureEPYC 7713EPYC 7763
Socket
SP3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7713 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureEPYC 7713EPYC 7763
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, SEV
VT-x, VT-d, SEV
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7713 launched at $7060 MSRP, while the EPYC 7763 debuted at $7890. On MSRP ($7060 vs $7890), the EPYC 7713 is $830 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 7763 — making the EPYC 7713 the 9.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7713EPYC 7763
MSRP
$7060-11%
$7890
Performance per Dollar
11.8+10%
10.7
Release Date
2021
2021