EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 7763

AMD

EPYC 7663

56 Cores112 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 7763

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7663

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,524 less on MSRP ($6,366 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($6,366 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
  • Draws 240W instead of 280W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7763 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (82,120 vs 84,440).

EPYC 7763

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
  • 16.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 240W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7763 better than EPYC 7663?
Yes. EPYC 7763 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7763 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7763 is the better fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7763 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7663 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 7763 is 23.9% more expensive on MSRP at $7,890 MSRP versus $6,366 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7663 is also 20.5% better value on MSRP (12.9 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7763 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 56/112. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7663EPYC 7763
1080p
low190 FPS190 FPS
medium155 FPS155 FPS
high123 FPS123 FPS
ultra96 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low156 FPS156 FPS
medium123 FPS123 FPS
high94 FPS94 FPS
ultra75 FPS75 FPS
4K
low72 FPS72 FPS
medium60 FPS60 FPS
high46 FPS46 FPS
ultra38 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7663EPYC 7763
1080p
low238 FPS418 FPS
medium211 FPS367 FPS
high174 FPS299 FPS
ultra138 FPS234 FPS
1440p
low195 FPS344 FPS
medium177 FPS310 FPS
high151 FPS259 FPS
ultra116 FPS197 FPS
4K
low121 FPS211 FPS
medium112 FPS194 FPS
high97 FPS163 FPS
ultra79 FPS131 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7663EPYC 7763
1080p
low836 FPS836 FPS
medium696 FPS696 FPS
high649 FPS649 FPS
ultra573 FPS573 FPS
1440p
low602 FPS602 FPS
medium500 FPS500 FPS
high458 FPS458 FPS
ultra400 FPS400 FPS
4K
low430 FPS430 FPS
medium335 FPS335 FPS
high300 FPS300 FPS
ultra242 FPS242 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7663EPYC 7763
1080p
low954 FPS975 FPS
medium863 FPS885 FPS
high739 FPS761 FPS
ultra637 FPS655 FPS
1440p
low733 FPS745 FPS
medium636 FPS648 FPS
high542 FPS554 FPS
ultra466 FPS476 FPS
4K
low522 FPS531 FPS
medium464 FPS473 FPS
high406 FPS414 FPS
ultra353 FPS360 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7663 and EPYC 7763

AMD

EPYC 7663

The EPYC 7663 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 82,120 points. Launch price was $6,366.

AMD

EPYC 7763

The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7663 packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the EPYC 7763 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7763 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7663 versus 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm+ process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7663 scores 82,120 against the EPYC 7763's 84,440 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 7763. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 7663EPYC 7763
Cores / Threads
56 / 112
64 / 128+14%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.45 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm+
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
82,120
84,440+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,370
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,380
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7663 versus 3200 on the EPYC 7763 — the EPYC 7763 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7663) and SP3 (EPYC 7763).

FeatureEPYC 7663EPYC 7763
Socket
SP3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
3200+79900%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+104857500%
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7663) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7763). Primary use case: EPYC 7663 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7663 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureEPYC 7663EPYC 7763
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, SEV
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7663 launched at $6366 MSRP, while the EPYC 7763 debuted at $7890. On MSRP ($6366 vs $7890), the EPYC 7663 is $1524 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7663 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 7763 — making the EPYC 7663 the 18.6% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7663EPYC 7763
MSRP
$6366-19%
$7890
Performance per Dollar
12.9+21%
10.7
Release Date
2021
2021