EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7702

AMD

EPYC 7573X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 7702

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7573X

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Costs $860 less on MSRP ($5,590 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 16.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

EPYC 7702

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7573X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (69,060 vs 69,432).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($6,450 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7573X better than EPYC 7702?
Yes. EPYC 7573X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 26.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7573X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 26.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7573X is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7573X is the smarter buy today. EPYC 7573X is $860 cheaper on MSRP at $5,590 MSRP versus $6,450 MSRP, and it gives you a 26.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.0% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7573X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7573XEPYC 7702
1080p
low205 FPS192 FPS
medium167 FPS172 FPS
high136 FPS138 FPS
ultra105 FPS110 FPS
1440p
low163 FPS157 FPS
medium127 FPS132 FPS
high100 FPS101 FPS
ultra79 FPS82 FPS
4K
low74 FPS72 FPS
medium61 FPS65 FPS
high48 FPS50 FPS
ultra40 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7573XEPYC 7702
1080p
low463 FPS247 FPS
medium407 FPS221 FPS
high329 FPS183 FPS
ultra259 FPS148 FPS
1440p
low381 FPS202 FPS
medium343 FPS186 FPS
high286 FPS158 FPS
ultra218 FPS124 FPS
4K
low234 FPS126 FPS
medium215 FPS118 FPS
high180 FPS103 FPS
ultra144 FPS84 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7573XEPYC 7702
1080p
low865 FPS629 FPS
medium717 FPS536 FPS
high668 FPS486 FPS
ultra590 FPS415 FPS
1440p
low622 FPS524 FPS
medium514 FPS446 FPS
high472 FPS394 FPS
ultra412 FPS338 FPS
4K
low444 FPS389 FPS
medium345 FPS312 FPS
high308 FPS274 FPS
ultra249 FPS224 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7573XEPYC 7702
1080p
low992 FPS904 FPS
medium900 FPS823 FPS
high775 FPS706 FPS
ultra671 FPS610 FPS
1440p
low767 FPS711 FPS
medium668 FPS620 FPS
high572 FPS530 FPS
ultra492 FPS450 FPS
4K
low550 FPS503 FPS
medium490 FPS452 FPS
high430 FPS398 FPS
ultra372 FPS343 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7573X and EPYC 7702

AMD

EPYC 7573X

The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

AMD

EPYC 7702

The EPYC 7702 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,060 points. Launch price was $6,450.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7702 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7702 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702 — a 7.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7573X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 7702 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the EPYC 7702's 69,060 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7573X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702.

FeatureEPYC 7573XEPYC 7702
Cores / Threads
32 / 64
64 / 128+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+7%
3.35 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+40%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
768 MB (total)+200%
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Milan-X (2022)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
69,432
69,060
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7702 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and SP3 (EPYC 7702).

FeatureEPYC 7573XEPYC 7702
Socket
SP3
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 7702 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

FeatureEPYC 7573XEPYC 7702
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7573X launched at $5590 MSRP, while the EPYC 7702 debuted at $6450. On MSRP ($5590 vs $6450), the EPYC 7573X is $860 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 7702 — making the EPYC 7573X the 14.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7573XEPYC 7702
MSRP
$5590-13%
$6450
Performance per Dollar
12.4+16%
10.7
Release Date
2022
2019