PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7513

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,935 less on MSRP ($2,840 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Delivers 69.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.0 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7642 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 7642

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 59,745).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).

EPYC 7513

2021

EPYC 7642

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,935 less on MSRP ($2,840 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Delivers 69.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.0 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7642 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 59,745).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7513 better than EPYC 7642?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 7642 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7513 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. EPYC 7642 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7513 is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7513 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 7513 is $1,935 cheaper on MSRP at $2,840 MSRP versus $4,775 MSRP, and it gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 7642 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 69.3% better value on MSRP (21.0 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7513 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 48/96. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7513 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7642 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
1080p
low	195 FPS	192 FPS
medium	159 FPS	172 FPS
high	129 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	160 FPS	157 FPS
medium	125 FPS	132 FPS
high	97 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	72 FPS
medium	60 FPS	65 FPS
high	47 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 7513 Open EPYC 7642

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
1080p
low	507 FPS	427 FPS
medium	442 FPS	381 FPS
high	353 FPS	312 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	249 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	351 FPS
medium	373 FPS	321 FPS
high	307 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	216 FPS
medium	233 FPS	202 FPS
high	204 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	139 FPS

Open EPYC 7513 Open EPYC 7642

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
1080p
low	850 FPS	629 FPS
medium	705 FPS	536 FPS
high	657 FPS	486 FPS
ultra	580 FPS	415 FPS
1440p
low	612 FPS	524 FPS
medium	506 FPS	446 FPS
high	464 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	338 FPS
4K
low	437 FPS	389 FPS
medium	339 FPS	312 FPS
high	303 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	224 FPS

Open EPYC 7513 Open EPYC 7642

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
1080p
low	990 FPS	909 FPS
medium	898 FPS	829 FPS
high	774 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	670 FPS	619 FPS
1440p
low	761 FPS	714 FPS
medium	664 FPS	624 FPS
high	568 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	489 FPS	455 FPS
4K
low	546 FPS	505 FPS
medium	487 FPS	455 FPS
high	428 FPS	401 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	346 FPS

Open EPYC 7513 Open EPYC 7642

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7513 and EPYC 7642

EPYC 7513

The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.

EPYC 7642

The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7513 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7642 offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 7513 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7513 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7642 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7513 scores 59,745 against the EPYC 7642's 59,333 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7513. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642.

Feature	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	3.65 GHz+7%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+8%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	59,745	59,333

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7513 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7642 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7513) and SP3 (EPYC 7642).

Feature	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7513 launched at $2840 MSRP, while the EPYC 7642 debuted at $4775. On MSRP ($2840 vs $4775), the EPYC 7513 is $1935 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7513 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7642 — making the EPYC 7513 the 51.5% better value option.