
EPYC 7642 vs Core Ultra 9 285HX

EPYC 7642
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 9 285HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Performance Comparison
About PassMarkPassmark Score
59333
Passmark Score
58732
Performance Difference
EPYC 7642 is 1.0% faster than Core Ultra 9 285HX
Benchmarks & Performance Comparison
In this CPU comparison, EPYC 7642 performs 1.0% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 9 285HX.
Both processors are popular choices for gaming PCs. Consider factors like core count, boost clock speeds, power consumption (TDP), and gaming vs productivity performance when choosing between these CPUs.
Technical Specifications
Detailed hardware specifications for EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 9 285HX

EPYC 7642
The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.
General Information
Technical Specifications
Compatibility
Memory

Core Ultra 9 285HX
The Core Ultra 9 285HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,732 points.
General Information
Technical Specifications
Compatibility
Memory
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores
Top Performing AMD(8)
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 9 285HX






























Steam Hardware Survey
Most popular gaming hardware · Last updated November 2024
Graphics Cards
Processors
Source: store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey