
EPYC 7551P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7551P
2017Why buy it
- ✅+76.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 496.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 7551P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 38,111).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7551P
2017Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+76.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 496.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 7551P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 38,111).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than EPYC 7551P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7551P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7551P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7551P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7551P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 834 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 758 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7551P and Ryzen 5 5600

EPYC 7551P
EPYC 7551P
The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7551P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7551P has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7551P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551P scores 38,111 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 55.5% lead for the EPYC 7551P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551P vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+47% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 38,111+77% | 21,550 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7551P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7551P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the EPYC 7551P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7551P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7551P) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7551P) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the EPYC 7551P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7551P) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+66550% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7551P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160.
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7551P launched at $2100 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($2100 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $1901 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7551P delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 142.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2100 | $199-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.1 | 108.3+498% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












