PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7313

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,017 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 180W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 7551P

2017

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7313 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,111 vs 38,938).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
❌16.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 155W.

EPYC 7313

2021

EPYC 7551P

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,017 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 180W, a 25W reduction.

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7313 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,111 vs 38,938).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
❌16.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7313 better than EPYC 7551P?

Yes. EPYC 7313 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 25.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7313 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.7% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 64 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7313 is the better fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7313 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 7313 is $1,017 cheaper on MSRP at $1,083 MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 98.1% better value on MSRP (36.0 vs 18.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7313 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 64 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7313 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7551P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7313	EPYC 7551P
1080p
low	166 FPS	187 FPS
medium	136 FPS	165 FPS
high	116 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	147 FPS	153 FPS
medium	118 FPS	127 FPS
high	94 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	71 FPS
medium	59 FPS	63 FPS
high	46 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 7313 Open EPYC 7551P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7313	EPYC 7551P
1080p
low	505 FPS	207 FPS
medium	441 FPS	188 FPS
high	354 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	415 FPS	178 FPS
medium	372 FPS	163 FPS
high	307 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	111 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	112 FPS
medium	233 FPS	103 FPS
high	205 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	75 FPS

Open EPYC 7313 Open EPYC 7551P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7313	EPYC 7551P
1080p
low	665 FPS	620 FPS
medium	555 FPS	518 FPS
high	518 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	451 FPS	399 FPS
1440p
low	504 FPS	517 FPS
medium	419 FPS	432 FPS
high	385 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	333 FPS	325 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	383 FPS
medium	290 FPS	308 FPS
high	260 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	220 FPS

Open EPYC 7313 Open EPYC 7551P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7313	EPYC 7551P
1080p
low	903 FPS	834 FPS
medium	822 FPS	758 FPS
high	708 FPS	651 FPS
ultra	624 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	667 FPS
medium	628 FPS	584 FPS
high	538 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	420 FPS
4K
low	517 FPS	475 FPS
medium	462 FPS	427 FPS
high	406 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	320 FPS

Open EPYC 7313 Open EPYC 7551P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7313 and EPYC 7551P

EPYC 7313

The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.

EPYC 7551P

The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7313 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7551P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7551P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P — a 20.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 7313 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7313 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7551P uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313 scores 38,938 against the EPYC 7551P's 38,111 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 7313. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551P.

Feature	EPYC 7313	EPYC 7551P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+50%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+100%	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	38,938+2%	38,111
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,736	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,264	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7313 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7551P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7313 versus 2666 on the EPYC 7551P — the EPYC 7551P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313) and SP3 (EPYC 7551P).

Feature	EPYC 7313	EPYC 7551P
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	2666+66550%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+209715100%	2048
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7551P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P). Primary use case: EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326; EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160.

Feature	EPYC 7313	EPYC 7551P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU	AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use	Server / High-load computing	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7313 launched at $1083 MSRP, while the EPYC 7551P debuted at $2100. On MSRP ($1083 vs $2100), the EPYC 7313 is $1017 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313 delivers 36.0 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 7551P — making the EPYC 7313 the 65.8% better value option.