
Core i7-14700HX
Popular choices:

EPYC 7551P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-14700HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while EPYC 7551P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,173 vs 38,111).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7551P
2017Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700HX across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,100 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-14700HX
2024EPYC 7551P
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while EPYC 7551P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,173 vs 38,111).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700HX across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,100 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-14700HX better than EPYC 7551P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-14700HX | EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-14700HX | EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 75 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-14700HX | EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 399 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-14700HX | EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 924 FPS | 834 FPS |
| medium | 841 FPS | 758 FPS |
| high | 725 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 694 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 599 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 528 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14700HX and EPYC 7551P

Core i7-14700HX
Core i7-14700HX
The Core i7-14700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,173 points. Launch price was $499.

EPYC 7551P
EPYC 7551P
The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.
Processing Power
The Core i7-14700HX packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 7551P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7551P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700HX versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7551P uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700HX scores 37,173 against the EPYC 7551P's 38,111 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 7551P. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700HX vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551P.
| Feature | Core i7-14700HX | EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 28 | 32 / 64+60% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+80% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+5% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+94% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 37,173 | 38,111+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,871 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,358 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-14700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7551P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700HX versus 2666 on the EPYC 7551P — the EPYC 7551P supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7551P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700HX) vs 8 (EPYC 7551P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700HX) vs 128 (EPYC 7551P) — the EPYC 7551P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-14700HX) and SP3 (EPYC 7551P).
| Feature | Core i7-14700HX | EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 2666+53220% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+9830300% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-14700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-14700HX) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P). The Core i7-14700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 7551P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160.
| Feature | Core i7-14700HX | EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, IOMMU |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













