Core i7-13700F vs EPYC 7551P

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700F

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 7551P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-13700F

16 / 24

38,212

+0.3%

38,111

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,741 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 486.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 7551P

2017

Why buy it

✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,111 vs 38,212).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700F

2023

EPYC 7551P

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,741 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 486.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,111 vs 38,212).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than EPYC 7551P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7551P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 23.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700F is $1,741 cheaper on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it gives you a 23.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 486.5% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 18.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 32/64. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700F Benchmark Check

EPYC 7551P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
1080p
low	264 FPS	187 FPS
medium	254 FPS	165 FPS
high	210 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	153 FPS
medium	193 FPS	127 FPS
high	153 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	71 FPS
medium	131 FPS	63 FPS
high	101 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open EPYC 7551P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
1080p
low	344 FPS	207 FPS
medium	293 FPS	188 FPS
high	247 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	178 FPS
medium	264 FPS	163 FPS
high	224 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	111 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	112 FPS
medium	160 FPS	103 FPS
high	152 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	75 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open EPYC 7551P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
1080p
low	647 FPS	620 FPS
medium	530 FPS	518 FPS
high	467 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	399 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	517 FPS
medium	491 FPS	432 FPS
high	427 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	325 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	383 FPS
medium	373 FPS	308 FPS
high	338 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	220 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open EPYC 7551P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
1080p
low	936 FPS	834 FPS
medium	851 FPS	758 FPS
high	735 FPS	651 FPS
ultra	660 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	799 FPS	667 FPS
medium	712 FPS	584 FPS
high	615 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	542 FPS	420 FPS
4K
low	548 FPS	475 FPS
medium	497 FPS	427 FPS
high	444 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	388 FPS	320 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open EPYC 7551P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700F and EPYC 7551P

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

EPYC 7551P

The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7551P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7551P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7551P uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the EPYC 7551P's 38,111 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-13700F. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551P.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+73%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+5%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+113%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	38,212	38,111
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,676	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,254	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7551P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus 2666 on the EPYC 7551P — the EPYC 7551P supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7551P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700F) vs 8 (EPYC 7551P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 128 (EPYC 7551P) — the EPYC 7551P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and SP3 (EPYC 7551P).

Feature	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
Socket	LGA1700	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200	2666+53220%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+9830300%	2048
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7551P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P). Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use	High-end Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700F launched at $359 MSRP, while the EPYC 7551P debuted at $2100. On MSRP ($359 vs $2100), the Core i7-13700F is $1741 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 7551P — making the Core i7-13700F the 141.7% better value option.