Core i7-14700HX vs EPYC 7303P

CPU

GPU

Core i7-14700HX

20 Cores28 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 7303P

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-14700HX

20 / 28

37,173

+1.9%

36,487

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-14700HX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 130W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while EPYC 7303P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (36,487 vs 37,173).
❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌136.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.

Core i7-14700HX

2024

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 130W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while EPYC 7303P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (36,487 vs 37,173).
❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌136.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-14700HX better than EPYC 7303P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7303P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-14700HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-14700HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 11.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700HX is the better fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-14700HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7303P makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-14700HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7303P is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (61.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-14700HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 28 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-14700HX Benchmark Check

EPYC 7303P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-14700HX	EPYC 7303P
1080p
low	315 FPS	159 FPS
medium	307 FPS	130 FPS
high	244 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	273 FPS	141 FPS
medium	236 FPS	113 FPS
high	175 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	68 FPS
medium	160 FPS	57 FPS
high	119 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-14700HX Open EPYC 7303P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-14700HX	EPYC 7303P
1080p
low	350 FPS	390 FPS
medium	299 FPS	346 FPS
high	251 FPS	283 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	304 FPS	329 FPS
medium	270 FPS	297 FPS
high	229 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	179 FPS	203 FPS
medium	163 FPS	186 FPS
high	155 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	127 FPS

Open Core i7-14700HX Open EPYC 7303P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-14700HX	EPYC 7303P
1080p
low	647 FPS	644 FPS
medium	529 FPS	526 FPS
high	466 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	411 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	499 FPS
medium	490 FPS	406 FPS
high	426 FPS	356 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	310 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	368 FPS
medium	373 FPS	286 FPS
high	338 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	197 FPS

Open Core i7-14700HX Open EPYC 7303P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-14700HX	EPYC 7303P
1080p
low	924 FPS	885 FPS
medium	841 FPS	806 FPS
high	725 FPS	696 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	610 FPS
1440p
low	778 FPS	696 FPS
medium	694 FPS	608 FPS
high	599 FPS	521 FPS
ultra	528 FPS	446 FPS
4K
low	549 FPS	498 FPS
medium	499 FPS	445 FPS
high	445 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	337 FPS

Open Core i7-14700HX Open EPYC 7303P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14700HX and EPYC 7303P

Core i7-14700HX

The Core i7-14700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,173 points. Launch price was $499.

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700HX packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 7303P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i7-14700HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700HX versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7303P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700HX scores 37,173 against the EPYC 7303P's 36,487 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i7-14700HX. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700HX vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P.

Feature	Core i7-14700HX	EPYC 7303P
Cores / Threads	20 / 28+25%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+59%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+94%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	37,173+2%	36,487
Geekbench 6 Single	2,871	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,358	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7303P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700HX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7303P — the EPYC 7303P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700HX) vs 8 (EPYC 7303P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700HX) vs 128 (EPYC 7303P) — the EPYC 7303P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-14700HX) and SP3 (EPYC 7303P).

Feature	Core i7-14700HX	EPYC 7303P
Socket	FCBGA1964	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	3200+63900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-14700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-14700HX) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P). The Core i7-14700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330.