
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 4545P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 54,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4545P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 98.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-13700K
2022EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 54,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4545P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 98.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4545P better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 219 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 850 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1072 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 760 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 842 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 747 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 421 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and EPYC 4545P

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 4545P
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 4545P's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4545P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 4545P's 54,255 — a 16.9% lead for the EPYC 4545P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 54,255+19% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4545P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 5600 on the EPYC 4545P — the EPYC 4545P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 28 (EPYC 4545P) — the EPYC 4545P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and AM5 (EPYC 4545P).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+104857500% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4545P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4545P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 4545P debuted at $549. On MSRP ($409 vs $549), the Core i7-13700K is $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 98.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4545P — making the Core i7-13700K the 12.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-26% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+13% | 98.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













