
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 4545P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 54,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4545P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Delivers 17.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$409 MSRP
Core i7-12700K
2021EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Delivers 17.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 54,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4545P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$409 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4545P better than Core i7-12700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 219 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 850 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 1072 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 760 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 842 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 747 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 421 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and EPYC 4545P

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 4545P
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 4545P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 4545P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P — a 7.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 4545P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the EPYC 4545P's 54,255 — a 44.9% lead for the EPYC 4545P. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+156% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 54,255+58% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4545P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus 5600 on the EPYC 4545P — the EPYC 4545P supports 15.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4545P supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 28 (EPYC 4545P) — the EPYC 4545P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and AM5 (EPYC 4545P).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 5600+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 192+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4545P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4545P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 4545P debuted at $549. On MSRP ($409 vs $549), the Core i7-12700K is $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 98.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4545P — making the EPYC 4545P the 16.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-26% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0 | 98.8+18% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













