
Core i9-9900KS
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 266V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900KS
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($513 MSRP vs $520 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌647.1% higher power demand at 127W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 127W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,274 vs 19,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌1.4% HIGHER MSRP$520 MSRPvs$513 MSRP
Core i9-9900KS
2019Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($513 MSRP vs $520 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 127W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌647.1% higher power demand at 127W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,274 vs 19,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌1.4% HIGHER MSRP$520 MSRPvs$513 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900KS better than Core Ultra 7 266V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 114 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 482 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 454 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 462 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900KS and Core Ultra 7 266V

Core i9-9900KS
Core i9-9900KS
The Core i9-9900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 127 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,397 points. Launch price was $513.

Core Ultra 7 266V
Core Ultra 7 266V
The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900KS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 7 266V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900KS versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V — identical boost frequencies (base: 4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i9-9900KS uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900KS scores 19,397 against the Core Ultra 7 266V's 19,274 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i9-9900KS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900KS vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+82% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+900% |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 19,397 | 19,274 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900KS uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9900KS launched at $513 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 266V debuted at $520. On MSRP ($513 vs $520), the Core i9-9900KS is $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900KS delivers 37.8 pts/$ vs 37.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 266V — making the Core i9-9900KS the 2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $513-1% | $520 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.8+2% | 37.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













