Core i5-1250P vs Core Ultra 7 266V

Intel

Core i5-1250P

12 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 266V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-1250P

2022

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core Ultra 7 266V needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 266V across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (19,167 vs 19,274).
  • 64.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 17W.

Core Ultra 7 266V

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 17W instead of 28W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Core i5-1250P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 266V better than Core i5-1250P?
Yes. Core Ultra 7 266V is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 11.4% average FPS lead across 14 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 266V is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 11.4% more average FPS across 14 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 266V is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 266V is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 7 266V is at an unclear MSRP at $520 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 11.4% average FPS lead across 14 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 266V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-1250PCore Ultra 7 266V
1080p
low169 FPS272 FPS
medium151 FPS243 FPS
high123 FPS205 FPS
ultra105 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS230 FPS
medium122 FPS185 FPS
high98 FPS152 FPS
ultra83 FPS134 FPS
4K
low80 FPS161 FPS
medium74 FPS130 FPS
high59 FPS101 FPS
ultra45 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-1250PCore Ultra 7 266V
1080p
low195 FPS236 FPS
medium166 FPS195 FPS
high153 FPS176 FPS
ultra137 FPS155 FPS
1440p
low172 FPS210 FPS
medium150 FPS181 FPS
high141 FPS164 FPS
ultra124 FPS139 FPS
4K
low139 FPS155 FPS
medium125 FPS138 FPS
high119 FPS132 FPS
ultra104 FPS114 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-1250PCore Ultra 7 266V
1080p
low479 FPS482 FPS
medium479 FPS482 FPS
high461 FPS482 FPS
ultra406 FPS482 FPS
1440p
low479 FPS482 FPS
medium465 FPS482 FPS
high415 FPS482 FPS
ultra367 FPS468 FPS
4K
low435 FPS482 FPS
medium356 FPS462 FPS
high315 FPS404 FPS
ultra257 FPS336 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-1250PCore Ultra 7 266V
1080p
low479 FPS482 FPS
medium479 FPS482 FPS
high479 FPS482 FPS
ultra479 FPS482 FPS
1440p
low479 FPS482 FPS
medium479 FPS482 FPS
high479 FPS482 FPS
ultra448 FPS482 FPS
4K
low470 FPS482 FPS
medium427 FPS482 FPS
high375 FPS480 FPS
ultra328 FPS418 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1250P and Core Ultra 7 266V

Intel

Core i5-1250P

The Core i5-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 266V

The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-1250P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 266V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-1250P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1250P versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-1250P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1250P scores 19,167 against the Core Ultra 7 266V's 19,274 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 266V. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-1250PCore Ultra 7 266V
Cores / Threads
12 / 16+50%
8 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5 GHz+14%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2.2 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+100%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Alder Lake-P (2022)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,167
19,274
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,250
Geekbench 6 Single
1,785
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,420
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1250P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-1250PCore Ultra 7 266V
Socket
FCBGA1744
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1250P) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 266V). The Core i5-1250P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Core Ultra 7 266V requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i5-1250PCore Ultra 7 266V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d