
Core i5-1250P
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 266V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1250P
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core Ultra 7 266V needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 266V across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,167 vs 19,274).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 17W.
Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 28W, a 11W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Core i5-1250P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1250P
2022Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core Ultra 7 266V needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 28W, a 11W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 266V across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,167 vs 19,274).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 17W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Core i5-1250P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 266V better than Core i5-1250P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 114 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 482 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 482 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1250P and Core Ultra 7 266V

Core i5-1250P
Core i5-1250P
The Core i5-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 7 266V
Core Ultra 7 266V
The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1250P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 266V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-1250P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1250P versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-1250P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1250P scores 19,167 against the Core Ultra 7 266V's 19,274 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 266V. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 19,167 | 19,274 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,785 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,420 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1250P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1250P) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 266V). The Core i5-1250P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Core Ultra 7 266V requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Core Ultra 7 266V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













