Core Ultra 7 255U vs Core Ultra 7 265U

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255U

12 Cores14 Thrd14 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

12 Cores14 Thrd14 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 255U

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,834 vs 17,900).

Core Ultra 7 265U

2025

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 265U better than Core Ultra 7 255U?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 255U is ahead with a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 265U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 265U is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 265U still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 7 265U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 265U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 14 threads instead of 12/14. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 255UCore Ultra 7 265U
1080p
low292 FPS278 FPS
medium256 FPS249 FPS
high216 FPS210 FPS
ultra187 FPS181 FPS
1440p
low243 FPS231 FPS
medium192 FPS186 FPS
high157 FPS153 FPS
ultra138 FPS134 FPS
4K
low168 FPS161 FPS
medium134 FPS131 FPS
high104 FPS102 FPS
ultra90 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 255UCore Ultra 7 265U
1080p
low446 FPS448 FPS
medium399 FPS372 FPS
high348 FPS327 FPS
ultra308 FPS287 FPS
1440p
low445 FPS415 FPS
medium367 FPS344 FPS
high322 FPS303 FPS
ultra276 FPS256 FPS
4K
low331 FPS310 FPS
medium285 FPS268 FPS
high265 FPS249 FPS
ultra228 FPS211 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 7 255UCore Ultra 7 265U
1080p
low446 FPS448 FPS
medium446 FPS448 FPS
high446 FPS448 FPS
ultra446 FPS448 FPS
1440p
low446 FPS448 FPS
medium446 FPS448 FPS
high446 FPS448 FPS
ultra446 FPS448 FPS
4K
low446 FPS448 FPS
medium446 FPS448 FPS
high446 FPS415 FPS
ultra379 FPS348 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 7 255UCore Ultra 7 265U
1080p
low446 FPS448 FPS
medium446 FPS448 FPS
high446 FPS448 FPS
ultra446 FPS448 FPS
1440p
low446 FPS448 FPS
medium446 FPS448 FPS
high446 FPS448 FPS
ultra446 FPS448 FPS
4K
low446 FPS448 FPS
medium446 FPS448 FPS
high446 FPS448 FPS
ultra427 FPS414 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255U and Core Ultra 7 265U

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255U

The Core Ultra 7 255U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,834 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

The Core Ultra 7 265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,900 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core Ultra 7 255U and Core Ultra 7 265U share an identical 12-core/14-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255U versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265U — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265U (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture using a 5 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255U scores 17,834 against the Core Ultra 7 265U's 17,900 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265U. Both processors carry 12 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255UCore Ultra 7 265U
Cores / Threads
12 / 14
12 / 14
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz
5.3 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+58%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB
12 MB
Process
5 nm
5 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-U (2025)
Arrow Lake-U (2025)
PassMark
17,834
17,900
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA2049 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255UCore Ultra 7 265U
Socket
FCBGA2049
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0