
Core i9-10920X
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 165H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10920X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $689 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 165H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+24.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 25,875).
Core i9-10920X
2019Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+24.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $689 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 165H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 25,875).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10920X better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 258 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 616 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 402 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 587 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 609 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10920X and Core Ultra 7 165H

Core i9-10920X
Core i9-10920X
The Core i9-10920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,875 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10920X versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 165H (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-10920X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10920X scores 25,875 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-10920X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10920X vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 22+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 25,875 | 25,849 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,458 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 44 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-10920X) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H). Primary use case: Core i9-10920X targets HEDT/Workstation.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | HEDT/Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













