
Core i7-14701E
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 165H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-14701E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $392 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,146).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14701E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-14701E
2024Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $392 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,146).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14701E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-14701E better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-14701E | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-14701E | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-14701E | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 562 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 402 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-14701E | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 629 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 556 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14701E and Core Ultra 7 165H

Core i7-14701E
Core i7-14701E
The Core i7-14701E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,146 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.
Processing Power
The Core i7-14701E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14701E versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-14701E (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-14701E uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14701E scores 26,146 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-14701E. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14701E vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H.
| Feature | Core i7-14701E | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 22+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total)+38% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 26,146+1% | 25,849 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,781 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-14701E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-14701E | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14701E) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H). The Core i7-14701E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 7 165H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14701E targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-14701E rivals Ryzen Embedded 8000.
| Feature | Core i7-14701E | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Embedded/Industrial | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













