
Core i7-13700H
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 165H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96EU), while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $502 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,140).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700H
2023Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96EU), while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $502 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,140).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700H better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700H | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700H | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 569 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 366 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 258 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700H | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 613 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 402 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700H | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 597 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700H and Core Ultra 7 165H

Core i7-13700H
Core i7-13700H
The Core i7-13700H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,140 points. Launch price was $502.

Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700H versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700H scores 26,140 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-13700H. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 22+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 26,140+1% | 25,849 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,101 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,279 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,208 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700H) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H). The Core i7-13700H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)), while the Core Ultra 7 165H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96EU) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













