
Core i5-1240P
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 155U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1240P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155U across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 155U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,185 vs 16,224).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1240P
2022Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155U across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 155U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,185 vs 16,224).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1240P better than Core Ultra 7 155U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1240P | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1240P | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1240P | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1240P | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 403 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1240P and Core Ultra 7 155U

Core i5-1240P
Core i5-1240P
The Core i5-1240P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,224 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 7 155U
Core Ultra 7 155U
The Core Ultra 7 155U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,185 points. Launch price was $490.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1240P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 7 155U's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1240P versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155U — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-1240P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 155U uses Meteor Lake-P (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1240P scores 16,224 against the Core Ultra 7 155U's 16,185 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-1240P. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 12 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Meteor Lake-P (2023) |
| PassMark | 16,224 | 16,185 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,268 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,102 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,577 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1240P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 155U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1240P) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 155U). The Core i5-1240P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics), while the Core Ultra 7 155U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1240P targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-1240P rivals Ryzen 5 6600U.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Core Ultra 7 155U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












