
Core i5-13450HX
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 155H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13450HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Core i5-13450HX needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i5-13450HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,869).
Core i5-13450HX
2023Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Core i5-13450HX needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i5-13450HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,869).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13450HX better than Core Ultra 7 155H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 618 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 402 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 622 FPS | 618 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 592 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 517 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13450HX and Core Ultra 7 155H

Core i5-13450HX
Core i5-13450HX
The Core i5-13450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,869 points. Launch price was $326.

Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13450HX packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13450HX versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13450HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 155H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13450HX scores 24,869 against the Core Ultra 7 155H's 24,705 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-13450HX. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13450HX vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H.
| Feature | Core i5-13450HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 22+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 24,869 | 24,705 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,650 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,384 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,433 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13450HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 155H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13450HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-13450HX) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Core i5-13450HX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13450HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Thin-and-light Performance / AI |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













