
Core i7-10700KF
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 236V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-10700KF
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $405 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 236V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 236V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 236V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,313 vs 18,380).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Core i7-10700KF
2020Core Ultra 5 236V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $405 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 236V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 236V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,313 vs 18,380).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700KF better than Core Ultra 5 236V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 236V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 236V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 100 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 236V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 236V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10700KF and Core Ultra 5 236V

Core i7-10700KF
Core i7-10700KF
The Core i7-10700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,380 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 5 236V
Core Ultra 5 236V
The Core Ultra 5 236V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,313 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10700KF packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 236V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-10700KF versus 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 236V — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700KF (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-10700KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700KF scores 18,380 against the Core Ultra 5 236V's 18,313 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-10700KF. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700KF vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 236V.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 236V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+9% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+900% |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 18,380 | 18,313 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 236V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-10700KF launched at $405 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 236V debuted at $0. On MSRP ($405 vs $0), the Core Ultra 5 236V is $405 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 236V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $405 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












