
Core i9-9990XE
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 235H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9990XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+15.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅57.1% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,392 vs 2,693).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,000 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 235H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1175% higher power demand at 255W vs 20W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 235H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+93.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 255W, a 235W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 140T Graphics, while Core i9-9990XE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (14,040 vs 16,199).
Core i9-9990XE
2019Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+15.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅57.1% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+93.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 255W, a 235W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 140T Graphics, while Core i9-9990XE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,392 vs 2,693).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,000 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 235H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1175% higher power demand at 255W vs 20W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 235H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (14,040 vs 16,199).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than Core i9-9990XE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9990XE | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9990XE | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 634 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 379 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 268 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9990XE | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 754 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 754 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 683 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 575 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 754 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 721 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 383 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9990XE | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 754 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 754 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 754 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 754 FPS | 741 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 754 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 754 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 746 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 591 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9990XE and Core Ultra 5 235H

Core i9-9990XE
Core i9-9990XE
The Core i9-9990XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,162 points. Launch price was $2,800.

Core Ultra 5 235H
Core Ultra 5 235H
The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9990XE packs 14 cores / 28 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 235H's 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-9990XE versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-9990XE (base: 4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i9-9990XE uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9990XE scores 30,162 against the Core Ultra 5 235H's 29,820 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-9990XE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,392 vs 2,693, a 63.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,199 vs 14,040 (14.3% advantage for the Core i9-9990XE). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9990XE vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H.
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28 | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total)+7% | 18 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 30,162+1% | 29,820 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,607 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,392 | 2,693+93% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,199+15% | 14,040 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9990XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9990XE versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235H — the Core Ultra 5 235H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 235H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9990XE) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 235H). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9990XE) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) — the Core i9-9990XE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9990XE) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H).
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+57% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-9990XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9990XE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H). The Core Ultra 5 235H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T Graphics), while the Core i9-9990XE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-9990XE targets HEDT, Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-9990XE rivals Threadripper 2970WX; Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Arc 140T Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | HEDT | Thin-and-light Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













