
Core i9-13905H
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 235H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13905H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+10.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.
Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅133.3% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,607 vs 19,384).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i9-13905H
2023Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+10.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅133.3% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,607 vs 19,384).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than Core i9-13905H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 379 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 268 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 721 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 383 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 745 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 741 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13905H and Core Ultra 5 235H

Core i9-13905H
Core i9-13905H
The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.

Core Ultra 5 235H
Core Ultra 5 235H
The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 235H's 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Core Ultra 5 235H's 29,820 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 17,607 (9.6% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 2,693, a 15.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 14,040 (0.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H.
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz+69% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+33% | 18 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 29,807 | 29,820 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,384+10% | 17,607 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | 2,693+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,000 | 14,040 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 235H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) — the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H).
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 28+133% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 235H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe 96EU (Core i9-13905H) and Intel Arc 140T Graphics (Core Ultra 5 235H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation, Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS; Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe 96EU | Intel Arc 140T Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Workstation | Thin-and-light Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













