Core i9-13905H vs Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel

Core i9-13905H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

14 Cores14 Thrd20 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13905H

2023

Why buy it

  • +10.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.

Core Ultra 5 235H

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
  • 133.3% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,607 vs 19,384).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than Core i9-13905H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 235H is ahead with a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13905H pulls ahead with 10.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i9-13905H also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13905H is the better fit. You are getting 10.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 235H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 5 235H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 235H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-13905HCore Ultra 5 235H
1080p
low262 FPS299 FPS
medium253 FPS262 FPS
high210 FPS218 FPS
ultra180 FPS187 FPS
1440p
low223 FPS245 FPS
medium192 FPS193 FPS
high154 FPS157 FPS
ultra135 FPS138 FPS
4K
low154 FPS168 FPS
medium132 FPS134 FPS
high101 FPS104 FPS
ultra90 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-13905HCore Ultra 5 235H
1080p
low636 FPS746 FPS
medium543 FPS625 FPS
high458 FPS499 FPS
ultra417 FPS440 FPS
1440p
low554 FPS704 FPS
medium492 FPS566 FPS
high416 FPS453 FPS
ultra357 FPS379 FPS
4K
low325 FPS415 FPS
medium296 FPS339 FPS
high279 FPS311 FPS
ultra246 FPS268 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-13905HCore Ultra 5 235H
1080p
low648 FPS746 FPS
medium530 FPS746 FPS
high467 FPS746 FPS
ultra405 FPS653 FPS
1440p
low591 FPS746 FPS
medium491 FPS721 FPS
high427 FPS624 FPS
ultra370 FPS537 FPS
4K
low434 FPS628 FPS
medium374 FPS519 FPS
high339 FPS458 FPS
ultra290 FPS383 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-13905HCore Ultra 5 235H
1080p
low745 FPS746 FPS
medium745 FPS746 FPS
high745 FPS746 FPS
ultra672 FPS741 FPS
1440p
low745 FPS746 FPS
medium723 FPS746 FPS
high626 FPS677 FPS
ultra552 FPS579 FPS
4K
low555 FPS604 FPS
medium504 FPS538 FPS
high451 FPS486 FPS
ultra394 FPS423 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13905H and Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel

Core i9-13905H

The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 235H's 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Core Ultra 5 235H's 29,820 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 17,607 (9.6% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 2,693, a 15.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 14,040 (0.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H.

FeatureCore i9-13905HCore Ultra 5 235H
Cores / Threads
14 / 20
14 / 14
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+8%
5 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
4.4 GHz+69%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+33%
18 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
29,807
29,820
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,384+10%
17,607
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
2,693+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000
14,040
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 235H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) — the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H).

FeatureCore i9-13905HCore Ultra 5 235H
Socket
FCBGA1792
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
192 GB+200%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
12
28+133%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 235H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H). Both include integrated graphics Iris Xe 96EU (Core i9-13905H) and Intel Arc 140T Graphics (Core Ultra 5 235H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation, Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS; Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.

FeatureCore i9-13905HCore Ultra 5 235H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe 96EU
Intel Arc 140T Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation
Thin-and-light Performance Laptop