
Core i9-12900H
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900H
2022Why buy it
- ✅+44.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,400 vs 2,677).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.9 vs 112.0 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Why buy it
- ✅+11.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $377 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 155.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.0 vs 43.9 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,943 vs 12,900).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i9-12900H
2022Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Why buy it
- ✅+44.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+11.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $377 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 155.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.0 vs 43.9 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,400 vs 2,677).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.9 vs 112.0 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,943 vs 12,900).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than Core i9-12900H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 616 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 677 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 476 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900H and Core Ultra 5 225T

Core i9-12900H
Core i9-12900H
The Core i9-12900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,079 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 5 225T
Core Ultra 5 225T
The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core i9-12900H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900H versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-12900H uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900H scores 27,079 against the Core Ultra 5 225T's 26,874 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-12900H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,400 vs 2,677, a 10.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,900 vs 8,943 (36.2% advantage for the Core i9-12900H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900H vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T.
| Feature | Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+40% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+2% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+20% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+140% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-H (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 27,079 | 26,874 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,400 | 2,677+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,900+44% | 8,943 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900H) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225T) — the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series (Mobile) (Core i9-12900H) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225T).
| Feature | Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-12900H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-12900H) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i9-12900H) and Arc Graphics (16EU) (Core Ultra 5 225T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900H targets Mobile, Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Arc Graphics (16EU) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mobile | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-12900H launched at $617 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225T debuted at $240. On MSRP ($617 vs $240), the Core Ultra 5 225T is $377 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900H delivers 43.9 pts/$ vs 112.0 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225T — making the Core Ultra 5 225T the 87.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $617 | $240-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.9 | 112.0+155% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













