
Core i5-14600T
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14600T
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌6.3% HIGHER MSRP$255 MSRPvs$240 MSRP
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,874 vs 27,238).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i5-14600T
2024Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌6.3% HIGHER MSRP$255 MSRPvs$240 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,874 vs 27,238).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than Core i5-14600T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 681 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 636 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 592 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14600T and Core Ultra 5 225T

Core i5-14600T
Core i5-14600T
The Core i5-14600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,238 points. Launch price was $255.

Core Ultra 5 225T
Core Ultra 5 225T
The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14600T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core i5-14600T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-14600T versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i5-14600T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-14600T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14600T scores 27,238 against the Core Ultra 5 225T's 26,874 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-14600T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,626 vs 2,677, a 1.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14600T vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+40% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+20% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 27,238+1% | 26,874 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,626 | 2,677+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,943 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14600T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14600T) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225T) — the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-14600T) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225T).
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-14600T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-14600T) and Arc Graphics (16EU) (Core Ultra 5 225T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14600T targets Low Power Desktop, Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-14600T rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc Graphics (16EU) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-14600T launched at $255 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225T debuted at $240. On MSRP ($255 vs $240), the Core Ultra 5 225T is $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14600T delivers 106.8 pts/$ vs 112.0 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225T — making the Core Ultra 5 225T the 4.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Core Ultra 5 225T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $255 | $240-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 106.8 | 112.0+5% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













