PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 9 270H

2024

Why buy it

✅+4.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).

Trade-offs

❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.

Core Ultra 5 225H

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,678 vs 2,800).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 16,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).

Core 9 270H

2024

Core Ultra 5 225H

2025

Why buy it

✅+4.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,678 vs 2,800).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 16,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core 9 270H better than Core Ultra 5 225H?

Yes. Core 9 270H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 13.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 9 270H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 9 270H is the better fit. You are getting 13.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 9 270H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core 9 270H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 9 270H Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 5 225H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core 9 270H	Core Ultra 5 225H
1080p
low	296 FPS	299 FPS
medium	272 FPS	262 FPS
high	226 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	241 FPS	245 FPS
medium	198 FPS	193 FPS
high	159 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	168 FPS	168 FPS
medium	138 FPS	134 FPS
high	105 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Core Ultra 5 225H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core 9 270H	Core Ultra 5 225H
1080p
low	720 FPS	685 FPS
medium	595 FPS	543 FPS
high	490 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	637 FPS	566 FPS
medium	539 FPS	471 FPS
high	445 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	327 FPS
4K
low	376 FPS	349 FPS
medium	324 FPS	293 FPS
high	299 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	233 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Core Ultra 5 225H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core 9 270H	Core Ultra 5 225H
1080p
low	720 FPS	720 FPS
medium	720 FPS	720 FPS
high	719 FPS	720 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	653 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	720 FPS
medium	693 FPS	720 FPS
high	594 FPS	624 FPS
ultra	512 FPS	537 FPS
4K
low	607 FPS	628 FPS
medium	513 FPS	519 FPS
high	463 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	383 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Core Ultra 5 225H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core 9 270H	Core Ultra 5 225H
1080p
low	720 FPS	720 FPS
medium	720 FPS	720 FPS
high	720 FPS	720 FPS
ultra	720 FPS	720 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	720 FPS
medium	720 FPS	720 FPS
high	720 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	636 FPS	579 FPS
4K
low	642 FPS	604 FPS
medium	570 FPS	538 FPS
high	510 FPS	486 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	423 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Core Ultra 5 225H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and Core Ultra 5 225H

Core 9 270H

The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

Core Ultra 5 225H

The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 225H's 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H — a 16.8% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Core Ultra 5 225H's 28,802 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 14,526 (12.7% advantage for the Core 9 270H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,678, a 4.5% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 12,337 (12.6% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H.

Feature	Core 9 270H	Core Ultra 5 225H
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	14 / 14
Boost Clock	5.8 GHz+18%	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	4.3 GHz+59%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+33%	18 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark	28,793	28,802
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,500+14%	14,526
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800+5%	2,678
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000+13%	12,337

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225H supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core 9 270H) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H).

Feature	Core 9 270H	Core Ultra 5 225H
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	128 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) and Intel Arc 130T GPU (Core Ultra 5 225H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.

Feature	Core 9 270H	Core Ultra 5 225H
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)	Intel Arc 130T GPU
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Extreme Gaming Laptop	Professional Content Creation Laptop