
Core Ultra 5 225F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225F
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,050 vs 18,500).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Core Ultra 5 225F
2025Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,050 vs 18,500).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Core Ultra 5 225F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 603 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 789 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 680 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 725 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 789 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 789 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 777 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 699 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 789 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 623 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 547 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225F and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Core Ultra 5 225F
Core Ultra 5 225F
The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225F packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 3.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225F uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 31,541 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 8.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,050 vs 18,500 (8.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,653 vs 2,700, a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,028 vs 15,000 (14.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+380% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 31,541 | 34,293+9% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,050 | 18,500+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,653 | 2,700+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,028 | 15,000+15% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225F uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 5 225F) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core Ultra 5 225F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 225F launched at $231 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($231 vs $449), the Core Ultra 5 225F is $218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 225F delivers 136.5 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Core Ultra 5 225F the 56.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $231-49% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 136.5+79% | 76.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











