
Core Ultra 5 225
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 19.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.7 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores), while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌20.6% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 17,020).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 108.3 vs 129.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225
2025Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 19.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.7 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores), while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌20.6% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 17,020).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 108.3 vs 129.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225 better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 603 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 680 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 725 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 778 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 777 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 699 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 623 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 547 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225 and Ryzen 5 5600

Core Ultra 5 225
Core Ultra 5 225
The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225 packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225 scores 31,137 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 36.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,020 vs 11,077 (42.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,653 vs 2,052, a 25.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,028 vs 8,600 (40.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+60% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 31,137+44% | 21,550 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,020+54% | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,653+29% | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,028+51% | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the Core Ultra 5 225 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). The Core Ultra 5 225 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 225 launched at $240 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($240 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $41 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 225 delivers 129.7 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Core Ultra 5 225 the 18% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240 | $199-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 129.7+20% | 108.3 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












