Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225

10 Cores10 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 225

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 46.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores), while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
  • 20.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $240 MSRPvs$199 MSRP

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • +60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Costs $41 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 17,020).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 88.9 vs 129.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225 better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 225 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 15.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 79.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 76.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 225 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225 is the better fit. You are getting 79.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 225 is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 5 225 is 20.6% more expensive on MSRP at $240 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 46.0% better value on MSRP (129.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 3600 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 225 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1851 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 10 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 225Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low256 FPS200 FPS
medium244 FPS161 FPS
high208 FPS135 FPS
ultra176 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low219 FPS154 FPS
medium187 FPS119 FPS
high154 FPS96 FPS
ultra133 FPS75 FPS
4K
low150 FPS70 FPS
medium127 FPS58 FPS
high99 FPS46 FPS
ultra86 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 225Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low603 FPS442 FPS
medium512 FPS404 FPS
high421 FPS332 FPS
ultra378 FPS295 FPS
1440p
low501 FPS420 FPS
medium441 FPS359 FPS
high372 FPS303 FPS
ultra319 FPS263 FPS
4K
low301 FPS297 FPS
medium266 FPS259 FPS
high248 FPS230 FPS
ultra218 FPS201 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 5 225Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low778 FPS442 FPS
medium680 FPS442 FPS
high609 FPS442 FPS
ultra522 FPS442 FPS
1440p
low725 FPS442 FPS
medium588 FPS442 FPS
high515 FPS442 FPS
ultra439 FPS432 FPS
4K
low504 FPS442 FPS
medium422 FPS361 FPS
high377 FPS305 FPS
ultra318 FPS242 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 5 225Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low778 FPS442 FPS
medium778 FPS442 FPS
high777 FPS442 FPS
ultra699 FPS442 FPS
1440p
low778 FPS442 FPS
medium716 FPS442 FPS
high623 FPS442 FPS
ultra547 FPS442 FPS
4K
low560 FPS442 FPS
medium510 FPS442 FPS
high457 FPS413 FPS
ultra402 FPS357 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225 and Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225

The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225 packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225 scores 31,137 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 55.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,020 vs 9,500 (56.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,653 vs 1,295, a 68.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,028 vs 1,898 (149.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
10 / 10+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+17%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+500%
512K (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
31,137+76%
17,685
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,020+79%
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,653+105%
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,028+586%
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Core Ultra 5 225 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225Ryzen 5 3600
Socket
LGA1851
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+25%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
24
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Core Ultra 5 225 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Yes
Target Use
Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 225 launched at $240 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($240 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $41 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 225 delivers 129.7 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Core Ultra 5 225 the 37.4% better value option.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP
$240
$199-17%
Performance per Dollar
129.7+46%
88.9
Release Date
2025
2019