
Core i5-14500
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14500
2024Why buy it
- ✅+15.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($239 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core Ultra 5 225
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,028 vs 15,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌0.4% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$239 MSRP
Core i5-14500
2024Core Ultra 5 225
2025Why buy it
- ✅+15.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($239 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,028 vs 15,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌0.4% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$239 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14500 better than Core Ultra 5 225?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14500 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14500 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14500 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 769 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 685 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14500 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 780 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 778 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 671 FPS | 777 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 699 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 739 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 655 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 565 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 402 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14500 and Core Ultra 5 225

Core i5-14500
Core i5-14500
The Core i5-14500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,205 points. Launch price was $232.

Core Ultra 5 225
Core Ultra 5 225
The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14500 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core i5-14500 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14500 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-14500 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-14500 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14500 scores 31,205 against the Core Ultra 5 225's 31,137 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-14500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 2,653, a 1.8% lead for the Core i5-14500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 13,028 (14.1% advantage for the Core i5-14500). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225.
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+40% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+2% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+20% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+140% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 31,205 | 31,137 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,020 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700+2% | 2,653 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+15% | 13,028 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14500) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225) — the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B760,Z790 (Core i5-14500) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225).
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14500) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-14500) and Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 5 225) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500 targets Mainstream Desktop, Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G.
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-14500 launched at $239 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225 debuted at $240. On MSRP ($239 vs $240), the Core i5-14500 is $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14500 delivers 130.6 pts/$ vs 129.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225 — making the Core i5-14500 the 0.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $239 | $240 |
| Performance per Dollar | 130.6 | 129.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













