
Core i7-13700TE
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 135H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700TE
2023Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 5 135H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,026 vs 22,116).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $390 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700TE
2023Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 5 135H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,026 vs 22,116).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $390 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 135H better than Core i7-13700TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700TE | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700TE | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 226 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700TE | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700TE | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 413 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700TE and Core Ultra 5 135H

Core i7-13700TE
Core i7-13700TE
The Core i7-13700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,026 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135H offers 14 cores / 18 threads — the Core i7-13700TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-13700TE versus 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700TE (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 135H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700TE scores 22,026 against the Core Ultra 5 135H's 22,116 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135H. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700TE vs 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H.
| Feature | Core i7-13700TE | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+14% | 14 / 18 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+4% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+227% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+67% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,026 | 22,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 135H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700TE | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-13700TE) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H). The Core i7-13700TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 5 135H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700TE targets Embedded.
| Feature | Core i7-13700TE | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













