Core i7-13700TE vs Core Ultra 5 135H

Intel

Core i7-13700TE

16 Cores24 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 135H

14 Cores18 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700TE

2023

Why buy it

  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 5 135H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (22,026 vs 22,116).
  • Launch MSRP is still $390 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core Ultra 5 135H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 135H better than Core i7-13700TE?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 135H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 135H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 135H is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 18 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 135H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700TE makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 5 135H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $390 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700TE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 135H is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-13700TECore Ultra 5 135H
1080p
low254 FPS193 FPS
medium239 FPS154 FPS
high202 FPS126 FPS
ultra173 FPS102 FPS
1440p
low219 FPS156 FPS
medium186 FPS122 FPS
high151 FPS98 FPS
ultra133 FPS81 FPS
4K
low149 FPS86 FPS
medium127 FPS73 FPS
high98 FPS59 FPS
ultra86 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-13700TECore Ultra 5 135H
1080p
low327 FPS553 FPS
medium279 FPS521 FPS
high234 FPS422 FPS
ultra212 FPS378 FPS
1440p
low271 FPS549 FPS
medium240 FPS457 FPS
high207 FPS379 FPS
ultra178 FPS324 FPS
4K
low168 FPS337 FPS
medium150 FPS283 FPS
high141 FPS258 FPS
ultra123 FPS226 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-13700TECore Ultra 5 135H
1080p
low551 FPS553 FPS
medium551 FPS553 FPS
high551 FPS553 FPS
ultra551 FPS553 FPS
1440p
low551 FPS553 FPS
medium551 FPS553 FPS
high551 FPS553 FPS
ultra551 FPS494 FPS
4K
low551 FPS548 FPS
medium494 FPS441 FPS
high439 FPS400 FPS
ultra371 FPS321 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-13700TECore Ultra 5 135H
1080p
low551 FPS553 FPS
medium551 FPS553 FPS
high551 FPS553 FPS
ultra551 FPS553 FPS
1440p
low551 FPS553 FPS
medium551 FPS553 FPS
high551 FPS553 FPS
ultra551 FPS553 FPS
4K
low551 FPS553 FPS
medium551 FPS524 FPS
high523 FPS473 FPS
ultra437 FPS413 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700TE and Core Ultra 5 135H

Intel

Core i7-13700TE

The Core i7-13700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,026 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135H

The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135H offers 14 cores / 18 threads — the Core i7-13700TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-13700TE versus 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700TE (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 135H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700TE scores 22,026 against the Core Ultra 5 135H's 22,116 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135H. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700TE vs 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H.

FeatureCore i7-13700TECore Ultra 5 135H
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+14%
14 / 18
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+4%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+227%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+67%
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
22,026
22,116
Geekbench 6 Single
2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 135H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-13700TECore Ultra 5 135H
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-13700TE) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H). The Core i7-13700TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 5 135H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700TE targets Embedded.

FeatureCore i7-13700TECore Ultra 5 135H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Embedded