PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $393 less on MSRP ($306 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 62,323).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +100.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 55.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core 3 100HL needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
128.4% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$306 MSRP
❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $393 less on MSRP ($306 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +100.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 55.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core 3 100HL needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 62,323).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
128.4% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$306 MSRP
❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core 3 100HL?

Yes. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 100.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 254.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 100.2% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better fit. You are getting 254.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 128.4% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $306 MSRP, and it gives you a 100.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 55.1% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 57.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core 3 100HL can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 3 100HL Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core 3 100HL	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	177 FPS	291 FPS
medium	144 FPS	265 FPS
high	119 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	144 FPS	275 FPS
medium	114 FPS	227 FPS
high	94 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	190 FPS
medium	68 FPS	156 FPS
high	54 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	107 FPS

Open Core 3 100HL Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core 3 100HL	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	201 FPS	734 FPS
medium	171 FPS	627 FPS
high	155 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	393 FPS
1440p
low	177 FPS	602 FPS
medium	155 FPS	536 FPS
high	143 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	138 FPS	338 FPS
medium	125 FPS	305 FPS
high	118 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	229 FPS

Open Core 3 100HL Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core 3 100HL	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	440 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	440 FPS	1122 FPS
high	440 FPS	1062 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	440 FPS	936 FPS
medium	440 FPS	845 FPS
high	440 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	387 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	439 FPS	574 FPS
medium	350 FPS	498 FPS
high	312 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	378 FPS

Open Core 3 100HL Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core 3 100HL	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	440 FPS	1082 FPS
medium	440 FPS	973 FPS
high	440 FPS	854 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	766 FPS
1440p
low	440 FPS	853 FPS
medium	440 FPS	751 FPS
high	440 FPS	659 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	569 FPS
4K
low	440 FPS	623 FPS
medium	440 FPS	555 FPS
high	440 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	426 FPS

Open Core 3 100HL Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 100HL and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 21.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 112% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Cores / Threads	8 / 12	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.7 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	4.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-PS (2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	17,586	62,323+254%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	38,581
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,926
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,643

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 100HL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 100HL) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core 3 100HL requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core 3 100HL launched at $306 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($306 vs $699), the Core 3 100HL is $393 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 100HL delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 43.2% better value option.